The vast majority of people listening to him speak have no idea about public land, or its value to Americans. Those are the ill-informed I speak of. When you use buzz words and incredulous talk instead of explaining policy clearly and specifically, you are absolutely pandering to those less...
He says he is pro-hunting, but I don't think he fully understands what that means. Or, more likely, he's pandering to the ill-informed for votes. In no way can you be pro-hunting and anti-public lands. That's like being pro-car and anti-public roads.
Regulations can change, depending on who is in office and public opinion considered. However, if we lose access to the land we own, it is gone. Forever. There is no going back. That, to me, is a much bigger issue than folks "trying to take our guns away".
I agree that the GOP is not perfect. Neither party is. If I have nowhere to hunt, there goes one of the most valuable things in my life.
I just hope that whatever arises from the ashes of the Republican party is far more patriotic, and far less devoted to greed and avarice, than today's GOP.
Some food for thought. The RNC's platform panel just publicly endorsed an amendment promoting the transfer of public lands to states. Anyone following this issue closely is sure to know that the majority of states cannot afford to manage this land and historically has opted to sell public land...
This article is a little short of specifics I would like, but seems pretty damn outrageous to me...
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/6/one-law-for-us-another-for-you/
Like the subject says, I was wondering if San Jacinto had any more blind cleanups billed this year before the season starts? I couldn't make the one earlier in the year and would like to help if it comes up again. Thanks!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.